![capture one pro 10 vs lightroom capture one pro 10 vs lightroom](https://www.thephoblographer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screenshot-84.png)
Adobe has always done a poor job converting X-Trans Raw files and that continues, but Adobe has a nice photography post processing tool called Lightroom which is a pretty good tool for working on an image after the Raw conversion is completed.
![capture one pro 10 vs lightroom capture one pro 10 vs lightroom](https://www.jmpeltier.com/travelogues/wp-content/uploads/C11.jpg)
#Capture one pro 10 vs lightroom software
This type of Raw file created by Fujifilm is not able to be processed by the accepted software in place at the time and even now only a few forward thinking companies process X-Trans Raw files. They invented a new filter, the X-Trans, which in a nutshell passes all color data in a different array but its all true color, not created by the camera or other software.
![capture one pro 10 vs lightroom capture one pro 10 vs lightroom](https://cdn.fstoppers.com/styles/full/s3/media/2019/11/27/capture-one-lightroom-workspace-comparison-1.jpg)
Fuji is all about color and that method just didn’t jive with them since color matters so much. This is a filter that passes all the red color data, but the remaining blue and green colors only have half their data passed and the rest is interpolated to make it 100%. Typically, 99.5% of the cameras out there use a Bayer filter over the sensor. Being a Fujifilm X systems camera user, which are those Fujifilm cameras with the X-Trans sensor, Raw conversion has always been a concern.